US Favors Glyphosate Ban
Bipartisan majorities in the US favor banning glyphosate, citing health concerns
Introduction To Glyphosate Controversy
The use of glyphosate, a widely used herbicide and the active ingredient in Roundup, has been a topic of controversy in recent years. Despite its widespread use in the United States since the 1970s, there have been growing concerns over its potential health effects. A recent survey conducted by the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) of the University of Pennsylvania has found that bipartisan majorities in the US favor banning glyphosate on crops grown in the country.
Survey Findings And Public Perception
The survey, which was conducted among 1,639 empaneled U.S. adults in April 2026, found that two-thirds of Americans favor banning the use of glyphosate on crops. This support cuts across political and ideological groups, with 70% of self-identified Republicans and 69% of self-identified Democrats favoring a ban. Additionally, 72% of people who identify as supporters of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement and 70% of those who do not support MAHA also favor a ban. 
Despite the strong support for banning glyphosate, the survey also found that most Americans have read, seen, or heard little about the herbicide in the few months preceding the survey. Many are also uncertain about its health effects. This lack of awareness and understanding highlights the need for further education and awareness-raising efforts on the potential risks associated with glyphosate use.
The Controversy Over Glyphosate
The controversy over glyphosate has been ongoing for several years, with many activists and organizations calling for its ban or phase-out. MAHA activists and influencers have been at the forefront of this movement, arguing that glyphosate poses significant health risks to humans and the environment. 
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also spoken out about the potential health risks associated with glyphosate, although he has not advocated for an outright ban. Other activists, such as Zen Honeycutt, the founder and executive director of Moms Across America, have dedicated their lives to getting glyphosate banned and transforming the food supply.
Real-World Implications And Future Outlook
The findings of the APPC survey have significant implications for the future of glyphosate use in the United States. With bipartisan majorities favoring a ban, there may be growing pressure on policymakers to take action and restrict the use of this herbicide. Additionally, the survey highlights the need for further education and awareness-raising efforts on the potential risks associated with glyphosate use.
As the debate over glyphosate continues, it is likely that we will see increased scrutiny of its use and potential health effects. The MAHA movement and other activist groups will likely continue to push for a ban or phase-out of glyphosate, and policymakers will need to carefully consider the evidence and make informed decisions about its use. Ultimately, the goal should be to prioritize public health and safety, while also ensuring that any decisions made are based on sound science and evidence.
Sources
This is an original synthesis by Qivorane based on reporting from the outlets below.